Peran Pendidikan dan Diklat terhadap Promosi Jabatan Pegawai Negeri Sipil

Authors

  • Achmad Irvan Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang
  • Marno Nugroho Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57218/jueb.v5i2.2876

Keywords:

education, training, competence, job promotion

Abstract

This study uses a quantitative explanatory approach and Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS 4 to analyze the role of education and training in competence and job promotion among civil servants in the Government of Kotawaringin Barat Regency. The study also examines competence as an intervening variable in the relationship between education, training, and job promotion. The population consisted of 2,154 active civil servants, and 146 respondents were selected using proportional stratified random sampling. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire. The findings indicate that education and training significantly improve employee competence. Education and training also contribute directly to job promotion, while competence shows the strongest effect on job promotion among all direct relationships in the model. In addition, competence significantly mediates the relationship between education and job promotion, as well as the relationship between training and job promotion. The coefficient of determination indicates that education and training explain 46.2% of the variance in competence, while education, training, and competence explain 54.8% of the variance in job promotion. These findings imply that the implementation of a merit-based promotion system in local government should not rely solely on formal education and participation in training, but also on measurable competence development aligned with job requirements.

References

Aguinis, H., & Kraiger, K. (2009). Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams, organizations, and society. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163505

Ali, M. (2022). Promosi jabatan dan faktor non-merit dalam birokrasi pemerintah daerah. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 9(2), 115–128.

Arthur, W., Jr., Bennett, W., Jr., Edens, P. S., & Bell, S. T. (2003). Effectiveness of training in organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.234

Badan Kepegawaian Negara. (2024). Statistik aparatur sipil negara tahun 2024.

Bagdadli, S., Gianecchini, M., Andresen, M., Cotton, R., Kaše, R., Lazarova, M., Smale, A., Bosak, J., Briscoe, J. P., Chudzikowski, K., Dello Russo, S., & Reichel, A. (2021). Human capital development practices and career success: The moderating role of country development and income inequality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(4), 429–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2506

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226041223.001.0001

Bell, B. S., Tannenbaum, S. I., Ford, J. K., Noe, R. A., & Kraiger, K. (2017). 100 years of training and development research: What we know and where we should go. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000142

Berenschot, W. (2018). Incumbent bureaucrats: Why elections undermine civil service reform in Indonesia. Public Administration and Development, 38(4), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1838

BKPP Kabupaten Kotawaringin Barat. (2019). Laporan kinerja instansi pemerintah Badan Kepegawaian, Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Kabupaten Kotawaringin Barat.

BKPP Kabupaten Kotawaringin Barat. (2023). Rencana strategis Badan Kepegawaian, Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Kabupaten Kotawaringin Barat.

Blunt, P., Turner, M., & Lindroth, H. (2012). Patronage’s progress in post-Soeharto Indonesia. Public Administration and Development, 32(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1605

Campion, M. A., Fink, A. A., Ruggeberg, B. J., Carr, L., Phillips, G. M., & Odman, R. B. (2011). Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 225–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01207.x

Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000). Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 678–707. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.678

Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business research methods (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Dwiputrianti, S. (2018). Challenges with implementing the merit system in the open recruitment of government high positions: The case in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Conference of the Asian Association for Public Administration (pp. 70–80). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aapa-18.2018.8

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Geisser, S. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika, 61(1), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/61.1.101

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6

Hamid, A. (2022). Pendidikan, pelatihan, kinerja, dan promosi jabatan pegawai negeri sipil. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 10(1), 45–59.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Karningsih, K., & Wibowo, A. S. (2024). Bureaucratic reform and the enhancement of civil service performance: A literature review on the merit system policy in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 1(2), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijsw.v1i2.479

Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.311

Marpaung, L. A., & Tanjung, Y. (2023). Pengaruh penilaian prestasi kerja, promosi jabatan dan kompetensi pegawai terhadap pengembangan karir aparatur sipil negara (ASN) pada Dinas Perindustrian Kota Medan. Jurnal Bintang Manajemen, 1(1), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.55606/jubima.v1i1.1136

Ng, T. W. H., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00515.x

Oliveira, A., & Perry, J. L. (2024). What does the evidence tell us about merit principles and government performance? Public Administration, 102(2), 456–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12945

Paais, M. (2022). Pengaruh pelatihan terhadap kinerja pegawai negeri sipil. Jurnal Manajemen dan Organisasi, 13(2), 88–99.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara. Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.

Pinnington, A. H. (2011). Competence development and career advancement in professional service firms. Personnel Review, 40(4), 443–465. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481111133336

Rahayu, S. (2023). Kompetensi dan prestasi kerja dalam mendukung promosi jabatan pegawai. Jurnal Administrasi dan Manajemen Publik, 11(1), 77–89.

Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436661

Sari, D., & Kurniawan, T. (2022). Pengaruh kompetensi dan prestasi sumber daya manusia terhadap promosi jabatan. Jurnal Manajemen Publik, 7(2), 90–104.

Seibert, S. E., Grant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 416–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.416

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2019). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (8th ed.). Wiley.

Setiawan, B., Lestari, A., & Pradana, R. (2023). Pendidikan dan peluang promosi PNS di pemerintah daerah. Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 12(1), 30–45.

Simanjuntak, R. (2023). Pengaruh penilaian prestasi kerja, promosi jabatan dan kompetensi pegawai terhadap pengembangan karir ASN. Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen, 8(1), 55–70.

Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 36(2), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (2nd ed.). Alfabeta.

Urtasun, A., & Núñez, I. (2012). Work-based competences and career prospects: A study of Spanish employees. Personnel Review, 41(4), 428–449. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481211229366.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-04