Deconstructing Power, Crafting Critical Writers: A Classroom-Based Study on Teaching Animal Farm through Deconstruction

Authors

  • Sunengko Sunengko Universitas Lancang Kuning
  • Nurfaisal Nurfaisal Universitas Lancang Kuning
  • Firmansyah Firmansyah Universitas Lancang Kuning
  • Dina Fitriani Universitas Lancang Kuning
  • Edward Edward Universitas Lancang Kuning

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57218/jupeis.Vol4.Iss3.1605

Keywords:

Animal farm, Critical thinking, Deconstruction, Literary education, Power and ideology

Abstract

This study employed a qualitative textual analysis using Jacques Derrida’s deconstruction approach to examine George Orwell’s Animal Farm. The research aims to uncover how language constructs and destabilizes power relations in totalitarian contexts by analyzing key binary oppositions, such as leader versus people, freedom versus oppression, and justice versus corruption. The analysis reveals that Orwell’s narrative exposes ideological contradictions through slogans like “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others,” illustrating how language manipulation legitimizes political control. The study also highlights how deconstructive reading encourages students to critically interpret textual ambiguities and power structures through reflective writing and classroom discourse. The findings show that integrating deconstruction into literature learning fosters students’ critical thinking and analytical writing skills. This research contributes to literary education by offering a pedagogical framework that promotes deeper engagement with literary texts, enabling students to relate literature to contemporary socio-political realities. It emphasizes the relevance of deconstructive pedagogy in cultivating critical and reflective readers within the framework of 21st-century education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albloly, A. M., & Nour, H. S. M. (2019). The portrayal of political symbolism in George Orwell writings: With reference to Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty-Four. The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 6(9), 5642-5648.

Al-Hilo, M., & Gebreen, H. (2021). Totalitarianism in George Orwell's Animal Farm. Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal, 2(4), 545-554. https://doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v2i4.318

Ali, Z., Hassan, R., & Majid, A. (2024). Power play in Animal Farm: A comprehensive CDA examination of power structures. Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences, 73-83.

Bobkina, J., & Stefanova, S. (2016). Literature and critical literacy pedagogy in the EFL classroom: Towards a model of teaching critical thinking skills. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 677-696.

Borsheim‐Black, C., Macaluso, M., & Petrone, R. (2014). Critical literature pedagogy: Teaching canonical literature for critical literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(2), 123-133.

Burnett, C., & Merchant, G. (2019). Revisiting critical literacy in the digital age. The Reading Teacher, 73(3), 263-266.

Chiasson, M., & Davidson, E. (2012). Reconsidering deconstruction in information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(2), 192-206.

Giroux, H. A. (2015). Totalitarian paranoia in the post-Orwellian surveillance state. Cultural Studies, 29(2), 108-140.

Gnanasekaran, R. (2015). Deconstructive interpretations of the novel Animal Farm by George Orwell. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 3(2), 13-15.

Hamlen Jr, W. A. (2000). The economics of Animal Farm. Southern Economic Journal, 66(4), 942-956.

Inch, J. (2016). Communism and the betrayal of the revolution: A Marxist critique of the post-revolutionary manipulation of the proletariat in Animal Farm.

Johnson, F. A. (2015). Australian fiction as archival salvage: Making and unmaking the postcolonial novel (Vol. 187). Brill.

Khan, N. H., & Bashir, M. Khan. R. W. (2022). Investigating the tenets of post-structuralism in George Orwell’s Animal Farm. Global Language Review, 7(3), 1-8.

Nealon, J. T. (1992). The discipline of deconstruction. PMLA, 107(5), 1266-1279.

Norris, C. (2020). Deconstruction and the 'unfinished project of modernity'. Routledge.

Nuramalia, I., Budiana, S., Mukodas, M., & Mubarock, W. F. (2023). Analisis Dekonstruksi dalam Novel Rahuvana Tattwa Karya Agus Sunyoto dari Novel Ramayana Karya P. Lal serta Implikasinya terhadap Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di SMA. Triangulasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Kebahasaan, Kesastraan, dan Pembelajaran, 3(1).

Pardede, P., Rasyid, Y., & Anwar, M. (2023). Manipulasi Linguistik sebagai Instrumen Politik dalam Animal Farm: Sebuah Analisis Wacana Kritis. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 6(2), 449-466.

Purba, A., & Harahap, E. P. (2023). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek (PjBL) pada Mata Kuliah Strategi Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Dikdaya, 13(1), 109-120.

Ramadhana, R. N., Elyani, E. P., & Muâ, F. (2022). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Melalui Analisis Sastra. Stilistika: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 15(2), 279-292.

Sterner, B. (2022). Explaining ambiguity in scientific language. Synthese, 200(5), 354.

Sunengko, S. (2024). The Impact of CEFR-Aligned Writing Assessments on Enhancing ESL/EFL Learners' Writing Competence: A Comparative Analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(2), 291-305. https://doi.org/10.36232/pendidikan.v12i2.7209

Sunengko, S., & Nurfaisal, N. (2024). The Impact Of Suggestopedia Method On Students' Writing Achievement: A Gender-Based Analysis. JUPEIS: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial, 3(3), 79-90.

Talbot, M. (2019). Language and power in the modern world. Edinburgh University Press.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons.

Ungkang, M. (2013). Dekonstruksi Jaques Derrida sebagai strategi pembacaan teks sastra. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 1(1), 30-37.

Wolfreys, J. (1998). Deconstruction-Derrida. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-24