Analysis of University Students' Digital Literacy Based on Five Dimensions of Digital Competence

Authors

  • Auliya Rusmayanti Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al Washliyah
  • Jun Anas'ash Ritonga Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al Washliyah
  • Nezifa Qhayummi Zahra Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al Washliyah
  • Mawaddah Rahmah Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al Washliyah
  • Nurdalilah Nurdalilah Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al Washliyah
  • Desniarti Desniarti Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al Washliyah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.57218/jupeis.Vol5.Iss3.3163

Keywords:

Digital competence, Digital literacy, Higher education, Information literacy

Abstract

Information in the digital space. Using a quantitative descriptive survey design, 30 active undergraduate students from various Indonesian universities were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected via a 30-item questionnaire based on five digital literacy dimensions: information access, information management and processing, digital communication and collaboration, digital security and privacy, and critical thinking and digital ethics, measured on a five-point Likert scale. Validity testing using corrected item-total correlation showed all items exceeded the 0.30 threshold, while reliability testing yielded a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.968, indicating excellent internal consistency. Descriptive statistics (mean scores and percentages) revealed that students' digital literacy generally falls into the high to very high category. The highest grand means were found in digital communication and collaboration (4.26) and digital security and privacy (4.26), both very high, followed by critical thinking and digital ethics (4.23). Information access (4.18) and information management and processing (4.15) fell into the high category. These findings indicate that while students are proficient in digital communication, collaboration, and security, further strengthening is needed in evaluating information credibility, using academic reference tools, and understanding copyright and data ethics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bujang, M. A., Omar, E. D., Foo, D. H. P., & Hon, Y. K. (2024). Sample size determination for conducting a pilot study to assess reliability of a questionnaire. Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, 49(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2024.49.e3

Carretero, Vuorikarii, & Punie. (2017). El marco de competencia digital para la ciudadanía con ocho niveles de dominio y ejemplos de uso. In Publications Office of the European Union (Number May). https://doi.org/10.2760/38842

Georgopoulou, M. S., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2025). Digital Literacy in Higher Education: Examining University Students’ Competence in Online Information Practices. Computers, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14120528

Getenet, S., Cantle, R., Redmond, P., & Albion, P. (2024). Students’ digital technology attitude, literacy and self-efficacy and their effect on online learning engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00437-y

Gutiérrez-Ángel, N., Sánchez-García, J.-N., Mercader-Rubio, I., García-Martín, J., & Brito-Costa, S. (2022). Digital literacy in the university setting: A literature review of empirical studies between 2010 and 2021. Frontiers in Psychology. www.recursoscientificos.fecyt.es/.

Hahnel, C., Eichmann, B., & Goldhammer, F. (2020). Evaluation of Online Information in University Students: Development and Scaling of the Screening Instrument EVON. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(December), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.562128

Karunia H, H., Ashri, N., & Irwansyah, I. (2021). Fenomena Penggunaan Media Sosial : Studi Pada Teori Uses and Gratification. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi Bisnis, 3(1), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.47233/jteksis.v3i1.187

Law, N., Woo, D., de la Torre, J., & Wong, G. (2018). Law, N., Woo, D., & Wong, G. (2018). A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy Skills for Indicator 4.4.2 (Information Paper No. 51; p. 146). UNESCO. http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/ip51-global-framework-reference-digital-lit.

Oetomo, R. K., Pamungkas, P. D. A., & Septianingsih, N. (2023). Literasi Digital Mahasiswa Menggunakan Kerangka Pengukuran Literasi Digital Kominfo. Jurnal MENTARI: Manajemen, Pendidikan Dan Teknologi Informasi, 2(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.33050/mentari.v2i1.356

Paturrahman, A., Febrianti, Y., Dongoran, A., & Sastrawati, E. (2024). Hambatan dan Tantangan Pembelajaran Berbasis TIK Pada Mata Kuliah Pengembangan Literasi Digital Kependidikan Mahasiswa PGSD Universitas Jambi. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(3), 1347–1358. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i3.10620

Rahardaya, A. K., & Irwansyah. (2021). Studi Literatur Penggunaan Media Sosial Tiktok Sebagai Sarana Literasi Digital Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Informasi Bisnis, 3(2), 308–319.

Salsabila, N. P., & Abidin, M. (2024). Analisis Urgensi Kompetensi Literasi Digital dalam Mendukung Kemampuan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah Mahasiswa. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 4(1), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.14421/njpi.2024.v4i1-15

Tachie-Donkor, G., & Ezema, I. J. (2023). Effect of information literacy skills on university students’ information seeking behaviour and lifelong learning. Heliyon, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18427

Trixa, J., & Kaspar, K. (2024). Information literacy in the digital age: information sources, evaluation strategies, and perceived teaching competences of pre-service teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 15(March), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1336436

Zhao, J. (2024). The relationship between information literacy and online learning engagement: a moderated mediating model. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02316-1.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31