Innovative Work Behavior Guru Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan

Authors

  • Ira Pratiwi Ramdayana Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
  • Hendro Prasetyono Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55784/jupeis.Vol1.Iss1.41

Keywords:

Innovative Work Behavior , Knowledge sharing, Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tingkat perilaku inovatif guru Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan secara deskriptif dan kausal ditinjau dari variabel knowledge sharing. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode survey. Penentuan sampel menggunakan insidental sampling dengan jumlah sebesar 165 orang responden. Teknik pengambilan data menggunakan angket dengan teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis jalur. Hasil penelitian: IWB guru-guru SMK berada dalam kategori baik karena rata-rata skor 1338,5 atau 81,12%. Terdapat pengaruh langsung yang positif dan signifikan knowledge sharing terhadap innovative work behavior. Besarnya pengaruh langsung knowledge sharing terhadap innovative work behavior adalah 0,515 yang berarti sedang. Kontribusi knowledge sharing terhadap innovatif work behavior sebesar 58,4%. Keterbatasan pada penelitian ini adalah baru dilakukan pada guru SMK. Penelitian dapat dilakukan dengan melibatkan populasi dari sekolah dasar atau sekolah menengah pertama.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akram, T., Lei, S., Haider, M. J., & Hussain, S. T. (2019). The impact of organizational justice on employee innovative work behavior: Mediating role of knowledge sharing. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, xxx(xxx), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.10.001

Asurakkody, T. A., & Kim, S. H. (2020). Effects of knowledge sharing behavior on innovative work behavior among nursing Students: Mediating role of Self- leadership. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, 12(Januari), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2020.100190

Burden, K., Kearney, M., Schuck, S., & Hall, T. (2019). Investigating the use of innovative mobile pedagogies for school-aged students: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education, 138(April), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.008

Coun, M. (M J. H. )., Peters, P. (C P. )., & Blomme, R. (R J. ). (2019). ‘Let’s share!’ The mediating role of employees’ self-determination in the relationship between transformational and shared leadership and perceived knowledge sharing among peers. European Management Journal, 37(4), 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2018.12.001

Craig, C. J., Zou, Y., & Curtis, G. (2018). The developing knowledge and identity of an Asian-American teacher: The influence of a China study abroad experience. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 17(August), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.09.002

Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352–364. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0134

Dahiya, R., & Raghuvanshi, J. (2021). Validation of innovative work behaviour scale: Indian apparel manufacturing sector. Asia Pacific Management Review, (xxxx). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.06.002

De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x

Dincer, H., Gencer, G., Orhan, N., & Sahinbas, K. (2011). The significance of emotional intelligence on the innovative work behavior of managers as strategic decision-makers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 909–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.052

Fraser, S., Beswick, K., & Crowley, S. (2019). Making tacit knowledge visible: Uncovering the knowledge of science and mathematics teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102907

Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001

Harris, L. (2011). Secondary teachers’ conceptions of student engagement: Engagement in learning or in schooling? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 376–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.006

Howell, J. B., & Saye, J. W. (2016). Using lesson study to develop a shared professional teaching knowledge culture among 4th grade social studies teachers. Journal of Social Studies Research, 40(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2015.03.001

Hutapea, E. (2019). Dituntut Inovatif dan Kreatif, 694 Guru Ikuti Pemilihan GTK Berprestasi 2019. KOMPAS.Com, p. 1. Retrieved from https://edukasi.kompas.com/read/2019/08/15/12232861/dituntut-inovatif-dan-kreatif-694-guru-ikuti-pemilihan-gtk-berprestasi-2019

Jumanta, H. (2016). Metologi Pengajaran. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara

Kaffashan Kakhki, M., Hadadian, A., Namdar Joyame, E., & Malakooti Asl, N. (2020). Understanding librarians’ knowledge sharing behavior: The role of organizational climate, motivational drives and leadership empowerment. Library and Information Science Research, 42(1), 100998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2019.100998

Korzilius, H., Bücker, J. J. L. E., & Beerlage, S. (2017). Multiculturalism and innovative work behavior: The mediating role of cultural intelligence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 56, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2016.11.001

Lin, F. ren, Lin, S. cheng, & Huang, T. ping. (2008). Knowledge sharing and creation in a teachers’ professional virtual community. Computers and Education, 50(3), 742–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.07.009

Messman, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2012). Development of a measurement instrument for innovative work behavior as a dynamic and context bound construct. Human Resource Development International, 15(1), 43-59

Mâţǎ, L., & Suciu, A. I. (2011). Curricular innovative model focused on developing pedagogical competences of teachers of Language and communication. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12(July 2010), 274–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.036

Mphahlele, L. K., & Rampa, S. H. (2014). Cluster System: An Innovative Network for Teacher Development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3131–3134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.721

Nasongkhla, J., & Sujiva, S. (2015). Teacher Competency Development: Teaching with Tablet Technology through Classroom Innovative Action Research (CIAR) Coaching Process. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 992–999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.723

Örnek, A. Ş., & Ayas, S. (2015). The Relationship between Intellectual Capital, Innovative Work Behavior and Business Performance Reflection. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1387–1395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.433

Pastore, S., & Andrade, H. L. (2019). Teacher assessment literacy: A three-dimensional model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 84, 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.05.003

Prasetyono, H., Abdillah, A., Widiarto, T., & Sriyono, H. (2018). Character-based Economic Learning Implementation and Teacher’s Reinforcement on Student’s Affective Competence in Minimizing Hoax. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(3), 426–435.

Prasetyono, Hendro, Abdillah, A., & Fitria, D. (2018). Academic Supervision toward Teacher ’ s Performance through Motivation as Intervening Variable. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 12(2), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v12i2.7324

PytlikZillig, L. M., Horn, C. A., Bruning, R., Bell, S., Liu, X., Siwatu, K. O., … Carlson, D. (2011). Face-to-face versus computer-mediated discussion of teaching cases: Impacts on preservice teachers’ engagement, critical analyses, and self-efficacy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.07.002

Shanker, R., Bhanugopan, R., van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Farrell, M. (2017). Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.02.004

Sriratanaviriyakul, N., & El-Den, J. (2017). Motivational Factors for Knowledge Sharing using Pedagogical Discussion Cases: Students, Educators, and Environmental Factors. Procedia Computer Science, 124, 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.158

Subramaniam, K. (2020). A place-based education analysis of prospective teachers’ prior knowledge of science instruction in informal settings. International Journal of Educational Research, 99(November 2019), 101497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101497

Sudibjo, N., & Prameswari, R. K. (2021a). The effects of knowledge sharing and person–organization fit on the relationship between transformational leadership on innovative work behavior. Heliyon, 7(6), e07334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07334

Sudibjo, N., & Prameswari, R. K. (2021b). The effects of knowledge sharing and person–organization fit on the relationship between transformational leadership on innovative work behavior. Heliyon, 7(6), e07334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07334

Suleimanova, S. (2013). Innovative Activity of the Teacher: In the Course of his Professional Formation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81, 395–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.449

Taştan, S. B., & Davoudi, S. M. M. (2015). An Examination of the Relationship between Leader-member Exchange and Innovative Work Behavior with the Moderating Role of Trust in Leader: A Study in the Turkish Context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.862

Jumanta, H. (2016). Metologi Pengajaran. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara

van Bommel, J., Randahl, A. C., Liljekvist, Y., & Ruthven, K. (2020). Tracing teachers’ transformation of knowledge in social media. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, 102958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102958

Wijayanto. (2018). Guru Dituntut Tranformatif-Inovatif Hadapi Era 4.0. Radar Surabaya, p. 1. Gresik, Jawa Timur.

Yassin, F., Salim, J., & Ashaari, N. S. @. (2013). The Influence of Organizational Factors on Knowledge Sharing Using ICT among Teachers. Procedia Technology, 11, 272–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.191.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-31